Legal Opinion
George M. v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 8, 2007No. AC 26961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The petitioner, George M., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly upheld the determination of the respondent, the commissioner of correction, that he was not eligible to earn good time credit as provided in General Statutes § 18-7a. We agree with the petitioner and reverse the judgment of the habeas court.
The relevant procedural facts are not in dispute. The state filed an information under docket number CR-96-94223, charging the petitioner with one count of sexual assault…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George M. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- George M. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007