Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 28, 2019No. Docket: And-18-84PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶1] Bartolo P. Ford appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Marden, J. ) denying in part and granting in part his petition for post-conviction review. Ford argues that the court erred by denying his requested relief concerning his felony convictions despite its determination that he had established that his trial counsel was ineffective. We vacate the court's judgment and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] In 2011, Ford filed a petition for post-conviction review alleging ineffective assistance of counsel on multiple grounds. In its judgment granting in part and denying in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dennis F. Winchester v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  2. Mario Gordon v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  3. Benjamin H. Hodgdon II v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  4. Richard Watson v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. Ernest B. Weidul v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API