Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Tilton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 27, 2011No. 09-55998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Kenneth Harrell Schultz appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court certified a single issue for our review under § 2253(c)(3): whether the California trial court’s use of California Jury Instruction, Criminal (“CALJIC”) No. 2.50.01 (8th ed.2002) violated Schultz’s constitutional right to due process by allowing the jury to find him guilty of charged offenses based only on facts found by a preponderance of the evidence.

We have jurisdiction under § 2253(a) and review the district court’s denial of the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cool v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keith Ford v. Suzanne PeeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Joshua Frost v. Ron Van BoeningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Keith Ford v. Suzanne PeeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. (HC) Avila, Jr. v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Harris v. LacknerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API