Legal Opinion
State v. Wimbs
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 9, 1993No. 11418-0-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
Following a bench trial, James M. Wimbs was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, with intent to deliver, RCW 69.50.401-(a)(l)(iii). His standard range sentence was enhanced by 24 months pursuant to RCW 9.94A.310(5) because the crime occurred within 1,000 feet of a school ground, in violation of RCW 69.50.435(a).
He appeals, contending prejudicial error based on: (1) failure to prove intent to deliver to a person within the school zone; (2) failure to demonstrate the accuracy of the system used to measure the 1,000 feet; (3) the unconstitutionality of RCW…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TongateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Marion Wilcox Combs, as Trustee of the 2646 S. Madison Street Trust, et al. v. Bethany Harrell, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993