Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McGee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. 59910-6Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

(dissenting) — I disagree with the majority's conclusion that RCW 69.50.435(a) is subject to only one reasonable interpretation. I would find the statute ambiguous and would apply well-settled rules of statutory construction to resolve the issues in this case. Because the majority fails to adhere these rules of construction, I must respectfully dissent.

This case involves a statute that is capable of and has been reasonably interpreted two ways. The first rule of construction ignored by the majority is that a statute is ambigú*797ous when it is susceptible to two or more reasonable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. United States v. Warren Eugene WakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API