State v. McGee
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentJohnson, J.
(dissenting) — I disagree with the majority's conclusion that RCW 69.50.435(a) is subject to only one reasonable interpretation. I would find the statute ambiguous and would apply well-settled rules of statutory construction to resolve the issues in this case. Because the majority fails to adhere these rules of construction, I must respectfully dissent.
This case involves a statute that is capable of and has been reasonably interpreted two ways. The first rule of construction ignored by the majority is that a statute is ambigú*797ous when it is susceptible to two or more reasonable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Warren Eugene WakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.