Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kramer v. William F. Murphy Self-Declaration of Trust

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2012No. 26072Published

1DissentZinter, Justice

[¶ 24.] I agree with the majority’s conclusion that “[t]he Disbursement Agreement, Loan Agreement, Promissory Note, and Balloon Note [may] be construed as a single contract involving the same transaction.” See supra ¶ 15. But this “contract” contained the terms for: Tri-State Ethanol’s agreement to acquire White Rock; Murphy’s agreement to finance the TriState Ethanol-White Rock transaction; and, Murphy’s agreement with others to distribute the loan proceeds. Therefore, the contract involved independent obligations and rights of multiple parties, and obviously, each party was not subject to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Homeward Bound Services, Inc. v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. Cole v. Wellmark of South Dakota, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API