Legal Opinion

Hou Hawaiians v. Cayetano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1999No. 98-15402PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The slip opinion filed on June 4, 1999 is amended as follows:

*947P.5700 — Add to ¶ 2 after “breaches of trust,” the following: At the same time the Hou declare unequivocally in their briefing that they are not seeking retroactive relief.

Strike all of the sections 2 and 3.

OPINION

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

The Hou Hawaiians, Nui Loa Price, and Kamuela Price (collectively the Hou) brought this suit against several federal and state officials in their official capacities. The district court denied the Hou’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed their complaint against all defendants.

This case is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Price v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Swan v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Price v. AkakaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Price v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Day v. ApolionaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Friends of Panamint Valley v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
  3. Kuamoo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Aupuni O Hawaii v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
  5. Day v. ApolionaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API