Legal Opinion

McBride v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 9, 2018No. Case No. 15–11222PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sean F. Cox, United States District Judge

In this class action, named Plaintiffs Mary McBride and Ralph Williams represent a class of deaf or hard of hearing individuals in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections who require hearing-related accommodations for various reasons. They have filed suit against the MDOC and various agency administrators and prison wardens, asserting violations *698of the American Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. ; the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. ; The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc, et…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lake v. City of Springfield, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  2. Larson v. EppingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Larson v. EppingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Larson v. EppingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Moore 238476 v. MirelesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API