Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 2, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Highways, condemned a strip *444of land 18 feet deep across the front of a lot belonging to appellees for the purpose of widening U. S. 60 through the city of Olive Hill. An additional 14-foot strip was taken for temporary use during construction. A jury in the Carter Circuit Court found the difference in value before and after taking to be $8,000. The Commonwealth has appealed.

This case has been tried twice in the Carter Circuit Court. The first judgment in the amount of $7,750 was reversed by this Court on the grounds that the amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. TyreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API