Legal Opinion
MICHELE A. YATES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 2016No. 15-AA-495PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:.
Petitioner Michele Yates asks us to review an order of the District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) which disqualified her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. She argues (1) that the OAH incorrectly found that it did not have jurisdiction to consider her appeal, and (2) that she did not commit an act of gross misconduct that would disqualify her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. We remand to the OAH for further consideration in light of this opinion.
I. Background
Until her termination, Petitioner worked as an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Filene's Basement Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Giles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donna Black v. DC Dept. of Human Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Vizion One, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Health Care FinanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- District of Columbia Dep't of Human Services v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Eckington House Mental Health Services, LLC v. Office of Wage HourDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025