Legal Opinion

Foster v. Westmoreland Casualty Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1992No. 2645 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Before this Court are exceptions filed by two law firms, Gallagher, Reilly and Lachat (Gallagher) and Duane, Morris and Heckscher (Duane), collectively Claimants, to the hearing referee’s findings of fact and recommendation that Claimants’ claims for attorney’s fees for services rendered to Westmoreland Casualty Company (Westmoreland) during its suspension be classified as general creditor claims under Section 544(b) of the Act of May 17, 1921, P.L. 789, commonly known as the Insurance Department Act (Act), as amended, 40 P.S. § 221.44(b). 1

Westmoreland was suspended by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Chester Extended Care Center v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Public School Bldg. Auth. v. QuandelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. MoranCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mazzella v. KokenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Bolduc v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Shoemaker v. City of Lock HavenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Borkey v. Township of CentreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API