Legal Opinion
Rose v. Centralia Township High School District No. 200
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 21, 1978No. 77-379PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, Dennis Rose, appeals from an order denying his second motion to reconsider and to file an amended complaint.
On May 22, 1975, the trial court entered the following order dismissing plaintiff’s second amended complaint:
“ORDER
The amended complaint fails to state a cause of action for reasons set forth in the motion to dismiss inasmuch as the weight of authority in Illinois supports the position of defendants. Wherefore, Counts I and II and each of them of the Amended Complaint be and the same are hereby dismissed and judgment is entered for defendants and against the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deckard v. JoinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Peach v. PeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Lakatos v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity & Illinois Psi Omega Ass'n v. SchwarzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Bates v. UlrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sullivan v. BachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Benet Realty Corp. v. Lisle Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Gibson v. Belvidere National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Branch v. European Autohaus, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- B-G Associates, Inc. v. GironAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.