Legal Opinion
Diehl v. ACRI CO.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 26, 1995No. 92-1224PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Kauffman made a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 95] denying two separate motions by Defendants to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Before the Court are Defendant ACRI’s Objection to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 96] and Defendant Holmberg’s Objection to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations Regarding Defendant Holmberg’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Doc. # 99]. The Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), shall undertake a de novo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Bruce Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- King v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roberson v. Cityscape Corp. (In Re Roberson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Ramadan v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997