Legal Opinion

Bordenave v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1958No. Civ. 9230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Plaintiff, appellant herein, brought this action against respondent, The Franchise Tax Board, to recover income taxes paid under protest.

Appellant and her husband purchased a ranch near Stockton, California, in 1944. The title was taken in the name of the husband, but it is without dispute that the purchase was made with community funds and that the property was community property of the two spouses. In 1946 husband and wife executed a deed to themselves in joint tenancy purporting to change the title to that form of ownership. The husband died April 2, 1948. Appellant brought a proceeding to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. O'CALLAGHAN v. PeopleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API