Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Poe

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 26, 1925No. 397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

The city of Seattle, plaintiff, owns and operates a municipal street ear system. The individual plaintiffs are employees of the city, in the department of publie utilities, street railway division. The suit purports to be brought not only for the plaintiffs, but on behalf of others similarly situated, against the collector of internal revenue, and prays that the defendant Burns Poe, collector, and all persons claiming to act under his authority, and that of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 227, be enjoined from requiring a return or collecting any taxes, exacting any…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brundage v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API