United States v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case presents a variation on when a police encounter evolves into a custodial interrogation, requiring officers to issue a warning under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Tamara Yvonne Jones challenges statements she made to a federal officer, Agent Jeff Bridge, who interrogated her in connection with her recent purchase of iodine crystals, a chemical used in methamphetamine production. During the encounter, Jones explained she had ordered the iodine hoping to resell it to another person who would use it to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. CashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.