Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 23, 2008No. 07-4141PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case presents a variation on when a police encounter evolves into a custodial interrogation, requiring officers to issue a warning under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Tamara Yvonne Jones challenges statements she made to a federal officer, Agent Jeff Bridge, who interrogated her in connection with her recent purchase of iodine crystals, a chemical used in methamphetamine production. During the encounter, Jones explained she had ordered the iodine hoping to resell it to another person who would use it to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. CashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API