Legal Opinion

Provident Bank v. Antonucci (In re Antonucci)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 2019No. Bankruptcy No. 16-16702-MDC; Adversary No. 16-00447-MDCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By: Magdeline D. Coleman, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court for disposition are two separate matters in the bankruptcy case of Marc S. Antonucci (the "Debtor"). First, the Debtor seeks to avoid a judgment lien (the "Lien Avoidance Motion")1 in favor of Provident Bank ("Provident," and together with the Debtor, the "Parties") in the amount of $7,391,404.88 pursuant to § 522(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (the "Bankruptcy Code"), which permits a debtor to avoid a judicial *621lien that impairs an exemption to which the debtor may be entitled.

Se…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,787 in Re John E. Tully, Debtor. Henry J. Boroff, Trustee in Bankruptcy of John E. Tully v. John E. TullyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. SpitkoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. United States v. SchiresonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Solar Innovations, Inc. v. PlevyakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API