School-District No. 13 v. Lovejoy
United States Circuit Court
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
McCrary, <T.
It may be conceded that the letter to Marquett was mailed as alleged, and that it was lost in the mail by accident, and still there is no sufficient showing of diligence in the defense of the action at law. Litigants are, for reasons of great public importance, required to exercise duo diligence in prosecuting or defending suits in which they are parties. Courts cannot make rules to aid or relieve those who are guilty of negligence. If Marquett had received the letter, he would have been under no legal obligation to defend the action. Moreover, it does not appear that he was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Loewe v. Union Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. MorganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1920
- Dallas Oil & Refining Co. v. Washington Cotton Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1924