Legal Opinion

Clopton v. Cecil

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1950No. 12160PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment reforming a deed upon the ground of mutual mistake. The primary question involved is whether Or not appellees demand for reformation was barred by the four year statute of limitations. Article 5529, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats. The deed was executed on November 8, 1938, and this suit was not filed until April 6, 1948. Appellant contends that appellee and T. S. Reed, who caused John H. Clopton, now deceased, to execute the conveyance to Lamar Cecil, the appellee, accepted and examined the deed in 1938, and that limitation commenced to run at that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sherman v. SipperTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Oldham v. MedearisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cleveland State Bank v. GardnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Kennedy v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Miles v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Briggs v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Carminati v. FenoglioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API