Legal Opinion
Edward W. Spannaus, Treasurer of the Larouche Democratic Campaign v. Federal Election Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 20, 1993No. 92-5191PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Edward Spannaus appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for review as untimely. Spannaus sought review in district court of the Federal Election Commission’s decision to dismiss an administrative complaint he filed pursuant to the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. §§ 431 et seq. (“the Act”). Under the Act, a petition for review must be filed “within 60 days after the date of the dismissal.” 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(8)(B).
Spannaus contends that his petition for review was timely because it was filed within 60 days of the date he received…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Individually, and as Attorney General of the United States, (Two Cases) Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Paul W. Kessenich v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Paul W. Kessenich, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Matar v. Transp. SEC. Admin.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Charles v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.