Legal Opinion
Arriaga v. Cross Country Bank
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 5, 2001No. 01 0498 IEG (RBB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration and stay the action pending arbitration by defendants Cross Country Bank and Applied Card Systems, Inc. (collectively the “defendants”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants defendants’ motion to compel arbitration on all claims and stays the action pending arbitration.
BACKGROUND
On March 21, 2001, plaintiff Andrea Ar-riaga (“Arriaga”) initiated this class action on behalf of herself and similarly situated individuals…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Aral v. Earthlink, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Bischoff v. DirecTV, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Klussman v. Cross Country BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.