Legal Opinion

Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided July 12, 1948No. Civil Action No. 1832Published

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMERMAN, District Judge.

I have for consideration the motion of the plaintiff for a new trial. 'This is an action for damages based upon an alleged slander. The case was tried with a jury April 15, 16, 1948. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

Upon the trial of the case I held and instructed the jury that the words complained of as having been spoken of and concerning the plaintiff by an agent of the defendant were not defamatory per se and consequently that the plaintiff had the burden of proving by the preponderance of the evidence extrinsic facts warranting a reasonable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. Clinton Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Fitchette v. Sumter Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Lily v. Belk's Department StoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Williamson v. Askin & Marine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API