Legal Opinion

In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-88515

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1984No. 17080-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

This petition for review presents the issue of whether the confession of the juvenile should have been suppressed at his juvenile transfer hearing. The Court of Appeals, in a memorandum decision, found no violation of the juvenile’s rights and affirmed the transfer order. In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-88515, 1 CA-JUV 199 (memorandum decision, filed Aug. 11, 1983). We accepted review. We hold that the confession should have been suppressed.

The juvenile in this case was arrested for an auto theft. While in custody, on August 18, 1982, he had a conversation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JimenezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lawhorn v. HaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
  3. In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 97036-02Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-102981Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API