Legal Opinion

State ex rel Frohnmayer v. Oregon State Bar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1988No. 87C-12045; CA A47455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The Oregon State Bar appeals the trial court’s grant of a writ of mandamus. The writ requires the Bar to transmit records in a disciplinary matter to the Attorney General so that he may determine whether the Bar must disclose them pursuant to a request under the Public Records Act. ORS 192.410 to ORS 192.505. We affirm.

The Bar instituted a disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer. The accused lawyer’s counsel, after receiving the discovery from the Bar’s files to which Bar Rule 4.5 entitled him, asked the Bar to produce further materials for his inspection under the act. The Bar refused on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Frohnmayer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Smith v. School District No. 45Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API