Legal Opinion
Winters v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 1914No. Nos. 18,655-(184)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
After the decision in the appeal reported in 126 Minn. 260, 148 N. W. 106, plaintiff moved that the remittitur b@ sent to the court below without payment of the judgment for costs.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff's motion that the remittitur he sent to the court below without payment of the judgment for costs is denied. By G. S. 1913, § 7983 (R. L. 1905, § 4347), the infant plaintiff and his guardian ad litem are liable for costs. There is no showing of the inability of the guardian to pay.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Strand v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951