Legal Opinion

D.A.N. Joint Venture v. Mead, No. Cv 89-371058 (Jun. 17, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 17, 1999No. CV 89-371058Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE POSTJUDGMENT INTEREST

This matter comes before the court pursuant to plaintiffs motion to compel compliance with a subpoena duces tecum. The parties, however, have agreed that the substance of the subpoena is the plaintiffs request for postjudgment interest, the propriety of which is the court's task to resolve.

Factual Background

The plaintiff secured a money judgment arising out of a promissory note to plaintiffs assignor, Fleet Bank. Judgment for $72,585.96 was entered against the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. Lex AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Niles v. NilesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API