Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1982No. 62897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

The defendant was indicted and convicted of two counts of selling marijuana to undercover agents who were investigating a “drug problem” at the construction site of the Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant.

1. On appeal the defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment for its failure to include the state and county of his residence. “Although the form of the indictment prescribed in [Code Ann. § 27-701] contains an averment of residence of the defendant, the omission of such averment in an indictment will not be ground for quashing the indictment. . .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Tarver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Colbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Rosser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pyburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Hogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API