Aunhkhotep v. Kopfensteiner
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AUNHK RA AUNHKHOTEP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:23 CV 540 RWS ) OFFICER JOSEPH KOPFENSTEINER, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff claims that the police officer defendants violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment when he was detained and his van was searched by a police drug dog. After due consideration of the issues before the Court on summary judgment,1 defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law for the reasons discussed below. Standards Governing Summary Judgment 1…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.