Legal Opinion

Ferlauto v. Hamsher

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1999No. B125980PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

Appellant, Attorney Thomas M. Ferlauto, sued respondents, Jane Hamsher, Don Murphy, Jane and Don Productions, Inc., and Broadway Books, for defamation and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer to Ferlauto’s second amended complaint. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural History

Ferlauto sued because of unflattering comments impliedly referring to him in Hamsher’s book entitled Killer Instinct: How Two Young Producers Took on Hollywood and Made the Most Controversial Film of the Decade (1997)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Wilbanks v. WolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Seelig v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Marcelo Rodriguez v. Georgios Kyriacos PanayiotouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API