Legal Opinion
Transit-mix Concrete Corp. v. Local Union No. 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1986No. 84 Civ. 8122 (JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The basic facts underlying this action are not in substantial dispute, and are as follows. Petitioner Transit-Mix Concrete Corporation (“Transit-Mix”) and respondent-cross-petitioner Local Union No. 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (“Local 282” or the “Union”) have, for many years, been parties to collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”). See Declaration of Robert Sasso (“Sasso Dec.”) at ¶2. These agreements have provided for the arbitration of all disputes. See, e.g., Ex. A to Sasso Dec. (“1984-87…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transit Mix Concrete Corp. v. Local Union No. 282, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Transit Mix Concrete Corporation v. Local Union No. 282Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987