Legal Opinion

King Drugs, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2008No. 2005-SC-000789-DGPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice ABRAMSON.

A 1986 amendment to former KRS 139.472, a statute exempting “prosthetic devices and physical aids” from Kentucky sales and use tax, is the focal point of the case before us. The Kentucky Board of Tax Appeals adopted the construction of the statute advanced by the taxpayers, King Drugs, Inc., and King Home Care, Inc., while the trial court and Court of Appeals construed the statute in the manner advanced by the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet. Having granted discretionary review in order to resolve the statutory dispute, we reverse the courts below and remand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Jackson Energy Cooperative Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stephenson v. WoodwardKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Popplewell's Alligator Dock No. 1, Inc. v. CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Layne v. NewbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Republic Bank & Trust Company v. Bear Stearns & Company., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Fox v. GraysonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Rodgers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API