Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Patterson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1989No. 87-1721PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

Maryland law requires medical malpractice claimants to exhaust an arbitration remedy provided by the state as a precondition to bringing any civil action on the claim in state or federal court. The question on this appeal is whether when a rejected arbitration claim is followed by a federal action invoking diversity jurisdiction, diversity is determined by the parties’ citizenship at the time the state arbitration claim was filed or at the time the federal diversity action was later commenced. We hold that citizenship at the time the federal action was commenced by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. James Conolly and Others v. Richard Taylor and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Davison v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lewis v. WaletzkyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,295 Harry G. Hager v. Ruth A. Gibson, Trustee for Preference, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Gantt v. MD Division of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  4. Brooks v. Maryland General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Rowland v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API