Tenneco Oil Co. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
Tenneco Oil Company and Navajo Refining Company appeal from the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission’s adoption of regulations establishing numerical standards for fourteen organic compounds 1 in groundwater. The issues raised in this consolidated appeal are: (1) what standard of review should this court apply; (2) whether the Commission’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; and (3) whether the decision was based on substantial evidence. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Prior to the adoption of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary, Department of Labor, Environmentaldefense Fund, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., David Sklar and Emanuel Sklar, and National Fisheries Institute, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- NMAC New Mexico Mining Ass'n v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Old Abe Co. v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Regents of University of California v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- New Mexico Mining Ass'n v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.