Legal Opinion

Millsaps v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1898No. 1419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEHDERSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two and one-half years; hence this appeal.

Ho statement of the facts appears in the record. The only questions raised are as to the sufficiency of the indictment and the charge of the court. The charging part of the indictment is as follows:

“One E. F. Millsaps, without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, did willfully and fraudulently make a false instrument in writing, which said false instrument is to the tenor following:
“Incorporated under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ames v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Tracy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Beasley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Chowning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API