Legal Opinion
John Doe, et al. v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 28, 2026No. 3:23-cv-04413Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04413-SI 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs John Doe and Robert Roe move for leave to amend their complaint. Dkt. No. 61 14 (Mot.). Defendant Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft (“Lufthansa”) filed an opposition, and 15 plaintiffs filed a reply.1 Dkt. No. 63 (Opp’n); Dkt. No. 64 (Reply). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 16 1(b),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.