Legal Opinion

Wolkenstein v. Reville

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1982No. CIV-77-618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

ELFVIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have brought this class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seeking a judgment declaring the procedures set forth in section 210 of New York’s Civil Service Law [“CSL”] unconstitutional on their face and as applied because they deprive public employees of their property without due process of law. Plaintiffs allege that these procedures are defective in that they (1) fail to provide an impartial initial hearing on the question of strike participation, and (2) do not provide any hearing at all prior to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wolkenstein v. RevilleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. GeorgiaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1983
  3. Wolkenstein v. RevilleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. McClendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. Van-S-Aviation v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API