People ex rel. Epstein v. Lawes
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.
The above-named relators seek by way of a writ of habeas corpus to obtain their discharge from imprisonment upon the ground that the judgment of conviction is void in that it was based upon the verdict of a jury which had been discharged from consideration prior to the submission to the jury of the issue of guilt.
The indictment was framed under the provisions of section 279 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (as amd. by Laws of 1936, chap. 328, § 1), the legality of which has recently been upheld by our Court of Appeals (People ex rel. Pincus v. Adams, 274 N. Y. 447). The extraordinary grand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Pincus v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Brinkman v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People v. MontlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- State v. . DrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- People ex rel. Wright v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. ZendanoNew York County Court, Erie County · 1954
- People v. BofillNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
- People v. Epstein, New York County Courts1957
- People v. NewsomeNew York Supreme Court · 1966