Legal Opinion

Robert Twitchell and Harrison Rogers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1964No. 17742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Following our decision on appeal in this case (Twitchell v. United States, 1963, 313 F.2d 425) appellant Harrison Rogers petitioned for certiorari. The Supreme Court, 84 S.Ct. 637, upon the Solicitor General’s confession of error, remanded the case to us “to reconsider the conviction on count nine in light of the Government’s confession of error and to determine whether the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed on the basis of the conviction under count seven.”

We have examined the government’s confession of error. It states that Wells paid for her own…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. BittySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Athanasaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SinghCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Claude Nolan Green, United States of America v. Franklin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Rodney FlucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Michael PepeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Juan Hernandez-ZozayaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API