Legal Opinion
State v. Fiesta Mart, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided September 20, 2007No. 14-06-00826-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.
The State of Texas brings this interlocutory appeal from a county court decision denying its plea to the jurisdiction. In five issues, the State complains that the court erred in denying its plea to the jurisdiction because (1) Fiesta, as a lessee of the property, does not have an ownership interest in the property being seized, (2) Fiesta cannot recover lost profits because it has not alleged impairment of access, and (3) Fiesta has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies in seeking relocation benefits. We affirm.
I. Background
Fiesta leases 7.3704 acres…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Royal Independent School District v. Ragsdale, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Texas Department of Transportation v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Jose Gerardo Padilla, Giovanna Padilla and Houston Best Foods & Services, LLC D/B/A Doneraki Fulton v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- City of Corinth v. NUROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Schriver v. Texas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.