First State Bank v. Twin City Bank
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
This case concerns the question of liability as between two banks victimized by a fraudulent scheme involving the use of documentary drafts. The trial court found that the bogus documentary drafts were not documentary drafts (as defined by the Uniform Commercial Code), but mere writings used in a fraudulent scheme. The court concluded that, although Twin City Bank, the payor/drawee bank, was late in returning the “drafts” unpaid to First State Bank of Sherwood, the depositary/collecting bank, the writings used in the scheme were not documentary drafts. As such,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New Ulm State Bank v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- The Union Bank of Benton, Arkansas v. The First National Bank in Mt. Pleasant, TexasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- State and Savings Bank of Monticello v. MeekerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Starcraft Co. v. C.J. Heck Co. of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Hamby Co. v. Seminole State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- First State Bank v. HallettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- American Title Insurance v. Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
- Nbt Bank, National Association v. First National Community BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Los Angeles National Bank v. Bank of CantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Southwest Bank & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.