Legal Opinion
OneSimpleLoan v. U.S. Secretary of Education
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 19, 2007No. Docket 06-2770-cv(L), 06-2994-cv(CON), 06-3770-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
The question presented is whether the “enrolled bill rule” articulated by the Supreme Court in Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649, 12 S.Ct. 495, 36 L.Ed. 294 (1892), requires the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims that the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”), Pub.L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006), was enacted in violation of the Bicameralism and Presentment Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 7, cl. 2, and the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 9, cl. 7, of the United States Constitution. Agreeing with the recent decision of the United States Court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- CFPB v. Law Offs. of Crystal MoroneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Elk Associates Funding Corporation v. United States Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- LeChase Constr. Servs. LLC v. Argonaut Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.