Legal Opinion

Blair Holdings Corp. v. Rubinstein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 24, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

In an action for recission of contract and damages, the plaintiff brought on an order to show cause why an order should not be entered directing it, within the twenty day period of Rule 26(a), 28 U.S.C.A., to take depositions of defendants, and granting certain injunctive relief pendente lite. The defendant Rubinstein then moved to dismiss, under Rule 12(b) (1), on the ground that diversity of citizenship, or more properly, alienage, is not set forth and in fact does not exist. The defendant Norfolk Insurance Company, Inc., simultaneously moved to dismiss under Rule…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Brown v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  5. Urquhart v. American-La France Foamite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blair Holdings Corporation v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. In re the Royal BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Blair Holdings Corporation v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. McCracken v. MurphyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Anderson v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API