Legal Opinion

In the Interest of W.M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

Washington County Children and Youth Social Service Agency (“CYS” or “Agency”) appeals from the Order finding that *620CYS was not eligible for federal funding for its foster care maintenance program because it did not use reasonable efforts to prevent placement of five minor children: fourteen-year-old male, W.M.; ten-year-old female, J.M.; six-year-old male, T.M.; four-year-old female M.M.; and three-year-old female, M.M. (collectively “the Children”) until January 14, 2011, the time that the trial court entered an Emergency Shelter Order.1 We affirm the trial court’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. In the Interest of R.J.T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. In re B.L.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of: D.M.D-C, Appeal of: CYFSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. In the Interest of: D.M.D-C, Appeal of: CYFSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. In Re: A.S., Appeal of: L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API