Simpson v. Rood
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal from a defense verdict in this negligence action arising out of a head-on collision in January 2000. This is plaintiffs’ second appeal in the same matter. See Simpson v. Rood, 2003 VT 39, 175 Vt. 546, 830 A.2d 4 (mem.). In this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s instructions to the jury. Plaintiffs invite the Court to adopt the negligence-per-se standard in cases involving a violation of motor vehicle safety laws. We decline the invitation because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that a different instruction would have affected the result. Therefore, we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mobbs v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Hoppe v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Simpson v. RoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Brown v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levine v. WyethSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Sadeta Zebic v. Rhino Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Cottrell v. LaidleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Emerson v. Shaws Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2025
- Levine v. WyethSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.