Legal Opinion

Barton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1921No. 6004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The evidence is sufficient to show that the appellant committed the act of robbery.

Preliminary to the proceeding with the trial the appellant sought to read to the jury an affidavit made by the mother of appellant stating that he was insane and had been twice adjudged a lunatic and placed in the asylum. This was not for the purpose of having the question of present insanity tried. The law makes provision to protect insane persons against punishment for crime during the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Witty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Cockrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Chase v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Blassingame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Yantis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Lapasnick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Genzer v. FillipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API