Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1911No. Civ. No. 978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

In the month of April, 1909, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing, by which the defendant agreed to and did lease from the plaintiff, fully furnished, the property known as the “Hotel Victoria,” in the city and county of San Francisco, for the term of five years.

In the month of May following the defendant went into possession of the leased property, and ever since has been in the use and occupation thereof as the tenant of plaintiff.

By the terms of the lease the defendant was required to maintain to the best of her ability the upkeep of all furnishings during the life…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Cutten v. PearsallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mills v. Oregon Ry. & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Shea-Bouqueraz Co. v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API