Legal Opinion

Muldoon v. Lynch

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1885No. 8,729PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of thecity and county of San Francisco,.and from an order refusing a new trial. Action to enforce a contract. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

The question involved in this appeal is, whether a sum named in a contract as a forfeiture is to be regarded as liquidated damages or as a penalty.

The plaintiffs and defendant executed a written contract, by which the plaintiffs were to furnish and complete certain improvements on the cemetery lot of defendant in a cemetery in San Francisco, viz : grading, brick-work, stone-work, monument, sarcophagus, etc., in which lot the remains of defendant’s deceased husband had been interred. The monument was to be of the best article of hard Ravaccioni Italian marble. The amount to be paid for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Streeter v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Salters v. RalphNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McCarthy v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API