Legal Opinion

Easton v. Broadwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 24, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

.Error from the Prolate Court of Payne County ■ lefore B. J. Basil, Prolate Judge. Application of N. B,. Easton, probate judge of Payne county, for restoring to the records and proceedings of that court a cost bond, under chapter 42 of Session Laws of 1895, entitled “Restoration of Court Records,” the bond being entered in an action of Henry Broadweli against N. B. Easton. STATEMENT Off THE CASE.

Read the full summary

.Error from the Prolate Court of Payne County ■ lefore B. J. Basil, Prolate Judge. Application of N. B,. Easton, probate judge of Payne county, for restoring to the records and proceedings of that court a cost bond, under chapter 42 of Session Laws of 1895, entitled “Restoration of Court Records,” the bond being entered in an action of Henry Broadweli against N. B. Easton. STATEMENT Off THE CASE. O'n the 9th day of September, 1896, the defendant in error, Broadweli, commenced an action in replevin in the probate court of Payne county, for the recovery of certain personal property from the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

McAtee, J.:

If the plaintiff in error is entitled to be-heard here, it is because of the provision in section 4436, Statues- of 1893, that this court “may reverse, vacate or-modify any of the following orders of the district court, or a judge thereof: First, a. final order. Second, an order that grants or refuses a continuance; discharges,, vacates or modifies a provisional remedy; or grants, refuses, vacates or modifies an injunction; that grants or- refuses a new trial; or that confirm®, oir refuses to confirm, the report of a referee; or that sustain® or overrules ■a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCallum v. LambieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Fleitas v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Brown v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. State Ex Rel. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Tankersley Inv. Co. v. Tankersley Inv. Co. ex rel. TankersleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API