Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beck v. Washington

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1962No. 40Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Black, with whom The Chief Justice concurs,

dissenting.

I dissent from the Court’s holding because I think that the failure of the Washington courts to follow their own state law by taking affirmative action to protect the petitioner Beck from being indicted by a biased and prejudiced grand jury was a denial to him of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

*559Since 1854, when Washington was a Territory, that State has had a statute comprehensively governing the use of grand juries in criminal trials which provides in part:

“Challenges to individual grand…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Pierre v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API