Beck v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Black, with whom The Chief Justice concurs,
dissenting.
I dissent from the Court’s holding because I think that the failure of the Washington courts to follow their own state law by taking affirmative action to protect the petitioner Beck from being indicted by a biased and prejudiced grand jury was a denial to him of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
*559Since 1854, when Washington was a Territory, that State has had a statute comprehensively governing the use of grand juries in criminal trials which provides in part:
“Challenges to individual grand…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Pierre v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.