People v. Carvajal
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Introduction
Appellants, Oscar Carvajal, Wilson Montoya, Jose Martinez, Smila Franks, and Ligia DeVinciquerra, appeal from the judgments entered upon their negotiated pleas of guilty and nolo contendere to various narcotic drug charges and enhancements following denial of their motions to quash and suppress. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (m).) On appeal, all appellants challenge the trial court’s orders denying their motions to quash search warrants and suppress evidence. Appellants Montoya and Martinez also contend that their sentence exceeded the double-the-base-term…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Pedro Aponte v. James H. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections Attorney General for the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- People v. MeredithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.